Syria crisis slowing defense policy bill talks, Inhofe says
In a brief hallway interview with reporters, the Oklahoma Republican said negotiations to reconcile the Senate and House bills, “kind of are stalling. Syria has messed up a little bit of that, because people think that is a more imminent problem to deal with than the NDAA, and it doesn’t have to be finished until December.”
On Wednesday, the “Big Four”―the chair and ranking members of both House and Senate armed services panels―were due to meet, to get things moving again. Meetings between their staff directors were ongoing over the two-week recess that ended Tuesday, Inhofe said.
Ahead of Wednesday’s closed-door huddle, Inhofe did not say whether the lawmakers would aim to insert Syria-related language into the bill, but he did not rule it out either.
“We haven’t really had a conversation on Turkey and Syria in the Big Four. That has not been on the radar, but you have to keep in mind that we went to recess before all this stuff happened,” Inhofe said. “We’re going to be talking about it. We’ll be meeting tomorrow.”
On Thursday, the Inhofe’s panel is scheduled to hold a closed hearing with Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley in an effort to find a substantive path for Congress to help turn the crisis around.
“There just isn’t an easy answer for that, and that’s why we’re having the hearing,” Inhofe said.
Wednesday’s NDAA meeting was likely to focus mainly on differences between the bill passed by the Democratic-controlled House and the Republican-controlled Senate. Inhofe disclosed there was a list of six outstanding issues which lawmakers will have to iron out before the end of the calendar year.
“It’ll be before Dec. 30 because it has to be, and for 58 years it has been,” Inhofe said. Inhofe has grown increasingly pessimistic since setting an aggressive schedule early last month.
The talks come as the administration scrambles to contain the fallout after President Donald Trump decided to pull U.S. troops back from northern Syria, spurring Turkey to launch a military operation against Kurdish forces who the Islamic State alongside the United States.
Trump has faced bipartisan criticism for the decision―and from the Big Four to varying degrees―that Trump’s decision betrays the Kurds and benefits Russia, Iran, the regime of Syrian dictator Bashar Assad and the remnants of the Islamic State.
Last week, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith, D-Wash., condemned Trump’s decision as “a catastrophic mistake” which “sends the message that the U.S. is an unreliable partner in the fight against terror, with our own President opening the door for our adversaries to take the lead on the global stage against us.”
House Armed Services Committee ranking member Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, is a cosponsor of Turkey sanctions legislation with House GOP Conference Chair Liz Cheney, R-Wyo. That bill hews with a proposal from Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.
Senate Armed Services Committee ranking member Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., is among lawmakers supporting a resolution rebuking Trump’s decision. In a statement last week, Reed, who is also a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, called for “hearings with military, diplomatic, and intelligence officials to understand how this decision was made and the consequences for Syria, the region, and our ability to work with partners in the future.
“President Trump needs to explain this hasty retreat in more than a tweet. He should address the American people and lay out a serious strategy.”