New York Man Uses 2nd Amendment Rights To Get State Stun Gun Ban Overturned
Banning the personal ownership of stun guns in New York state is unconstitutional because it violates individuals’ Second Amendment right to bear arms, a federal judge ruled Friday.
“New York’s sweeping prohibition on the possession and use of tasers and stun guns by all citizens for all purposes, even for self-defense in one’s own home, must be declared unconstitutional,” U.S. District Judge David Hurd wrote in his decision according to The Associated Press.
Hurd also wrote that people trading firearms for stun guns could result in fewer weapons deaths.
The decision came in a lawsuit filed by Matthew Avitabile, of Schoharie County, New York, who said he wanted to buy a stun gun for self-defense in his home. https://t.co/Whey00HeMs
Avitabile, who is also the mayor Middleburgh, New York, wanted to buy a stun gun to defend himself in his home in rural upstate New York, reported the AP.
Avitabile said that although his town is as safe “as Mayberry,” he wants New Yorkers to be able to protect themselves, reported The New York Post.
Forty-seven states allow Taser and stun guns with varying levels of regulation, according to The New York Post. Now the stricter states are starting to reverse course.
Do you agree with the federal judge’s decision?
96% (48 Votes)
4% (2 Votes)
A Massachusetts court ruled that state’s stun gun ban unconstitutional in 2017.
New York is not known for being friendly to firearms businesses.
For example, New York-based, firearms-related business company Check-Mate Industries is expanding not in the Empire State, with its highly restrictive gun control laws, but in Georgia.